![]() On that basis, their relationship does not appear as straightforward convergence but rather as a dialectical process that highlights their respective limitations. ![]() IHL draws on the order of states as decisive entities of rights and liabilities, whereas IHRL takes humanity as reference point. In this paper, I will argue that the concrete lines of conflict between IHL and IHRL in that regard can be viewed as markers for fundamental normative questions arising in a changing global political framework. At the same time, the regimes are characterized by different logics, which become most apparent with regard to the protection of the right to life, or the permissibility to kill a person. ![]() It is undisputed today that IHRL also applies in situations of armed conflict, and that norms of the two regimes are regularly intertwined. The relationship between international humanitarian law (IHL) and international human rights law (IHRL) has occupied legal scholarship extensively over the last decades.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |